Skip to main content
Logo
Article · 1 Jan 2017

Conditions of Collective Commitment in Sector-Specific Coordinated Governance Initiatives

by Berta van Schoor, Christoph Luetge · Published by Springer Netherlands
Collective Action

Although both the problem of corruption and its detrimental effects on society, economy, and environment has widely been recognized, corruption remains one of the most challenging problems of today. In light of globalization, the exclusive focus on compliance-oriented measures such as sharpening laws seems to be more and more ineffective.

Apparently, the problem is not so much a lack of anti-corruption regulation, but rather a lack of enforcement of existing regulatory frameworks. This governance gap is increasingly tackled by the business sector. As a consequence, new governance mechanisms characterized by the involvement of non-state actors have emerged in recent years, in an attempt to fill this gap.

These Coordinated Governance Initiatives in which companies along with representatives of other societal sectors join forces to tackle the problem of corruption have not been in the focus of research so far. More research is needed particularly on the effectiveness of these collective anti-corruption efforts to explain whether this approach is useful to curb corruption. Therefore, we attempt to identify potential success factors of Coordinated Governance Initiatives that aim to curb corruption by means of a qualitative multiple-case study.

Twenty semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of three different initiatives. Additionally, secondary data sources were examined. Three different anti-corruption initiatives were selected: the Ethics Management of the Bavarian Construction Industry (EMB), the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI), and the Maritime Anti-Corruption Network (MACN).

We found five success factors and one basic prerequisite for sector-specific Coordinated Governance Initiatives. Although the identification of success factors of Coordinated Governance Initiatives is just the first step in the assessment of these initiatives, results indicate that a collective commitment obviously matters when it comes to fighting corruption.

How to cite

van Schoor, B. & Luetge, C. Crime Law Soc Change (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9714-2

Related publications

Working Paper 60: Understanding the enemy: Insights from corrupt networks to improve anti-corruption Collective Action initiatives
Collective Action, Prevention Research and Innovation

Working Paper 60: Understanding the enemy: Insights from corrupt networks to improve anti-corruption Collective Action initiatives

Anti-corruption Collective Action in the G20/B20 process: Charting progress 2020–2024
Collective Action, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance

Anti-corruption Collective Action in the G20/B20 process: Charting progress 2020–2024

Collective Action in practice: a game-changer for business integrity
Collective Action, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance

Collective Action in practice: a game-changer for business integrity

Working Paper 56: Anti-corruption Collective Action: A typology for a new era
Collective Action, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance

Working Paper 56: Anti-corruption Collective Action: A typology for a new era

Putting business integrity on the global agenda: Report from the 5th International Collective Action Conference
Collective Action, Private Sector, Business Integrity Ethics and Compliance

Putting business integrity on the global agenda: Report from the 5th International Collective Action Conference

Policy Brief 11: Lutte contre la corruption dans les États côtiers d’Afrique de l’Ouest : comment l’Action Collective peut aider
Collective Action

Policy Brief 11: Lutte contre la corruption dans les États côtiers d’Afrique de l’Ouest : comment l’Action Collective peut aider

Policy Brief 8: It takes a network to defeat a network – What Collective Action practitioners can learn from research into corrupt networks
Collective Action, Corruption Prevention and Public Governance

Policy Brief 8: It takes a network to defeat a network – What Collective Action practitioners can learn from research into corrupt networks

Policy Brief 9: Informal networks and what they mean for anti-corruption practice
Corruption Prevention and Public Governance

Policy Brief 9: Informal networks and what they mean for anti-corruption practice

Companies’ assessments of anti-corruption compliance
Collective Action, Private Sector

Companies’ assessments of anti-corruption compliance

Policy Brief 13: Catalysing the private sector for disaster response and resilience – Case study of the Philippine Disaster Resilience Foundation
Collective Action

Policy Brief 13: Catalysing the private sector for disaster response and resilience – Case study of the Philippine Disaster Resilience Foundation

Connect with us

Stay up to date with new opportunities to learn, engage and work with the Basel Institute