Skip to main content
Logo
Country

Ethiopia

3 items related to "Ethiopia"

News and blog

3 items
What is an Ethically Aware Supplier – and how does it support business integrity in Africa?
12 March 2021

What is an Ethically Aware Supplier – and how does it support business integrity in Africa?

Local certification is emerging as an interesting way for large companies and their supply chains to help address compliance and due diligence issues that can be a barrier to business. A recent Basel Institute working paper showed how local certification programmes developed with a Collective Action approach can help: SMEs to develop and demonstrate robust anti-corruption compliance procedures; ease due diligence for large companies seeking suppliers in local markets; raise standards of integrity across a market or geographical area. The Ethically Aware Supplier Induction EASI programme of The Ethics Institute in South Africa, first developed as a project of the Siemens Integrity Initiative, harnesses this innovative approach. Its expansion into other African countries under a recent grant of the UK Business Integrity Initiative Challenge Fund shows how agile and flexible Collective Action can be – even when working in very different and challenging contexts, and in the face of a global pandemic. Kris Dobie, Manager – Organisational Ethics at The Ethics Institute, gives an insight into the project below: What is the idea behind EASI? Multinational companies want to do business with suppliers that are committed to operating with integrity and that actively manage their corruption risks. This is partly to manage their own legal and reputational risks. From a big-picture point of view, this can have a positive consequence in developing markets: by insisting on high standards of anti-corruption compliance through their supply chains, multinationals can become an important driver of good governance. But in practice, SMEs need support and training. Who better to support SMEs in their compliance journey than their larger customers? What exactly is EASI? EASI helps companies that want to train their suppliers by providing an online interactive short course in business ethics. The aim is to make participants aware of key ethical issues that are relevant to their companies. It is based on the principles of the UN Global Compact and the content is benchmarked against the supplier codes of conduct of several large companies. Members of the senior management of SMEs – with influence over the companies’ business ethics and operations – can complete the course on behalf of their businesses. If they pass the assessment, we certify the company as “ethically aware”. This emphasises their knowledge and awareness of integrity issues relevant to their company and of the main ethical requirements of multinational enterprises. We don’t certify the company itself as ethical. You can find out about the course on the EASI website or watch this two-minute YouTube video: Where do the large companies come in? Ideally, this foundational online training is combined with a live group session where suppliers and representatives of the larger companies come together for a structured discussion on some of the key topics. We find that significant additional learning – on all sides – takes place here. Many of the compliance officers, procurement specialists and internal auditors who have taken part in these discussions tell us how eye-opening it is to learn of the realities faced by their suppliers. Rolling out EASI throughout supply chains Our strategy involved large organisations taking charge of rolling out the EASI programme throughout their supply chains. We started close to home, with the Coalition for Ethical Operations. This is a private sector-led Collective Action initiative that The Ethics Institute facilitates. Its members, who are multinational companies, commit to promoting ethical business across Sub-Saharan Africa and to training their suppliers. We also partnered with the UN Global Compact local networks in Kenya and Ghana. When the pandemic hit and travel became impossible, we managed to free up funding to partner with the UN Global Compact network in Nigeria, as well as the Addis Ababa Chamber of Commerce in Ethiopia. What adaptations did you make to address covid-19? The meetings went online, of course, and sadly webinars replaced business breakfasts and face-to-face engagements. This was rather challenging to facilitate. Group discussions in person foster trust, whereas building a relationship between strangers on a video call is not quite the same. Attendance and attention were also lower online. Nevertheless, we enrolled 34 multinationals and 82 individuals in the EASI programme across those four countries, and have certified a similar number of SMEs so far. How did you promote the programme despite the pandemic restrictions? We believe that business networks are key to reaching more companies, large and small. After all, they are about business getting together to collectively raise the bar. This is why it has been fantastic to partner with the UN Global Compact networks and with the Addis Chamber. Companies that engage in the EASI programme clearly see its value. One large telecoms company is currently rolling out the EASI programme to subsidiaries and operating companies across its group. If a couple more in this sector follow, EASI will become a form of industry standard. And that’s when tangible change will really occur. Improving together There are however a number of issues we are still grappling with. The feedback we get tells us that this is a really good product, but it still needs to be marketed to take off internationally – and anti-corruption practitioners are not necessarily marketers. We want to strike the balance between making the programme accessible to as many companies as possible, while ensuring they value it properly. Dealing with "products" as an ethics non-profit organisation has proven to be a healthy learning curve. These are issues that I know many fellow practitioners are grappling with in their contexts, as they seek to attract a critical mass of companies to their initiatives. Learning from and supporting each other, such as at the recent peer learning workshops hosted by the Basel Institute or the roundtables as part of their wider certification project, are crucial. We also thank the Siemens Integrity Initiative and UK Business Integrity Initiative for their support in making this idea become a reality for ourselves and hundreds of companies across Southern Africa. \ \ \ About The Ethics Institute The Ethics Institute is an independent public institute with the vision of ‘Building an ethically responsible society’. They pursue this vision by working with organisations in the public and private sectors where they offer a range of services related to organisational ethics, including training, assessments and advisory services. See www.tei.org.za About the UK Business Integrity Initiative and Challenge Fund The UK's Business Integrity Initiative Challenge Fund was launched to support innovative, business-focused, Collective Action initiatives aiming at reducing corruption or promoting human rights to improve the investment climate in emerging markets and developing countries. IMC Worldwide has been working closely with the UK Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office FCDO as the Business Integrity Initiative Challenge Fund Manager. Find out more. About the Siemens Integrity Initiative The Siemens Integrity Initiative promotes projects around the world that seek to combat corruption and fraud, supporting educational and training programmes as well as Collective Action, which is building alliances against corruption in a joint effort between business and institutions to establish clean markets and ensure fair competition. See siemens.com/collective-action.

Learning through doing, even online – East Africa training with ARIN-EA
11 August 2020

Learning through doing, even online – East Africa training with ARIN-EA

Eighteen participants from anti-corruption authorities across East Africa took part in the first ever online delivery of our Financial Investigations and Asset Recovery training programme last week. Our International Centre for Asset Recovery ICAR training team conducted the five-day intensive training programme at the request of ARIN-EA, an East African network for informal information-sharing on asset recovery matters. ARIN-EA’s President, Ms Lillian William Kafiti from Tanzania’s Prevention and Combating of Corruption Bureau, is a former ICAR trainee and graduate of our successful train-the-trainer programme in 2017. Learning by doing – even virtually The ICAR training approach emphasises the importance of “learning by doing” and practical work forms around 50 percent of each of our training courses. In our flagship Financial Investigations and Asset Recovery programme, ICAR trainers guide participants through a complex simulated investigation with its maze of financial transactions. Despite the challenges of replicating this kind of practical work online weak connectivity in particular , the participants successfully formed breakout groups of practitioners from various agencies and countries. Together they worked hard at “investigating” the case involving the fictitious Mr Boniface Msangi, Director of Public Works at the Ministry of Internal Development in Tanzania, and deciding how best to charge the suspect using the criminal provisions of one of the participant countries in each group. Fostering inter-agency and regional collaboration An ARIN-EA spokesperson thanked all the participants for taking the course and encouraged them to make greater efforts to “work as a region in collaboration to fight corruption”. This is a particularly fitting statement. Our training programmes are designed to encourage inter-agency collaboration in the investigation and prosecution of corruption and money laundering crimes, as well as asset recovery, by including representatives of various law enforcement agencies within our programmes. This programme contained an additional regional dimension. The participants came from a wide variety of agencies and countries: the Financial Intelligence Unit South Sudan , Criminal Investigation Division of the Police Uganda and Kenya , Inspectorate of Government Uganda , Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission Kenya , Special Brigade Anti-Corruption Burundi , Anti-Corruption Court Burundi , Ombudsman Rwanda , Prevention and Combating of Corruption Bureau Tanzania , Inspector General Djibouti , Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions Kenya , Office of the Attorney General Ethiopia and South Sudan Anti-Corruption Commission. Feedback from participants was encouragingly positive, with many commenting on the “superb” lessons and “able trainers” thanks to whom “I learnt a lot”.

News
Africa-Europe asset recovery cooperation: high-level meeting in Berlin
27 March 2018

Africa-Europe asset recovery cooperation: high-level meeting in Berlin

Practitioners and policy makers from Africa and Europe met last week in Berlin, Germany, to discuss ways to further accelerate the success rate in recovering stolen assets. The event was organised by the German Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development BMZ with support from the Basel Institute's International Centre for Asset Recovery ICAR and GIZ, and brought together representatives from Ethiopia, France, Germany, Jersey, Kenya, Norway, Switzerland, Tanzania, Tunisia, Uganda and the United Kingdom. In brief, key priorities are to shed light on financial transactions, modernise legislation and provide guidance for the return of stolen assets. The opening remarks by Norbert Barthle, Parliamentary State Secretary, BMZ, and a high-level panel with Prof Mark Pieth President of the Basel Institute on Governance and Mr Akere Muna Member of the High Level Panel on Illicit Financial Flows from Africa inspired the discussion centred around the fact that asset recovery is a responsibility shared between countries from which assets are stolen and countries through which stolen assets are laundered. Success in recovering stolen assets depends on frank and open dialogue between concerned jurisdictions throughout the asset recovery process. The two-day event sought to facilitate this dialogue with participants by identifying numerous avenues through which they can collaborate further in this work. These included shedding more light on financial transactions, including through beneficial ownership registries, the use of illicit enrichment offences in the criminal context and the use of non-conviction based forfeiture predicated on unexplained wealth within the civil courts. It was highlighted that where these laws are applied, together with the use of deferred prosecution agreements and plea bargains, there should be provision for the restitution of funds to states from which assets have been stolen. Effective tracing, freezing and recovery of assets located overseas requires international co-operation through law enforcement and formal evidence gathering under mutual legal assistance. Increasing the effectiveness of this process through regional networks and the development of informal contacts is key, as is the understanding of different states’ capacities to follow financial transactions through bank registers and beneficial ownership of company registers. Finally, there was wide agreement on the need for guidelines to assist in discussions about the return and end use of stolen assets.

News

Connect with us

Stay up to date with new opportunities to learn, engage and work with the Basel Institute

We use cookies to measure how this site is used. Accept to allow analytics cookies. Essential, cookieless measurement runs regardless. More info