[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":627},["ShallowReactive",2],{"publication-la-extinction-de-dominio-instrumentos-internacionales":3,"related-la-extinction-de-dominio-instrumentos-internacionales":160},[4],{"id":5,"status":6,"sort":7,"date_created":8,"date_updated":9,"nid":7,"slug":10,"title":11,"body":12,"citation":7,"language":7,"year":7,"publisher":13,"date_published":14,"external":7,"topic":7,"link_internal":15,"link_external":22,"featured":26,"topics":27,"languages":29,"type":31,"area":7,"programme":7,"websites":33,"summary":35,"pdf_text":7,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"image":36,"og_image":7,"countries":49,"tags":77,"pdf":132,"authors":159},2448,"published",null,"2026-07-16T16:05:53.000Z","2026-07-16T16:34:13.000Z","la-extinction-de-dominio-instrumentos-internacionales","La extinctión de dominio en el marco de los estándares e instrumentos internacionales","Non-conviction based asset forfeiture has become a key tool for recovering illicit assets and supporting contemporary criminal policy against organised crime, corruption and transnational financial crime. Across seven chapters, this publication (in Spanish) connects international standards with Peruvian practice.\n\nIt explores the foundations of non-conviction based asset forfeiture from various angles:\n- Non-conviction based forfeiture in the Vienna, Palermo and Mérida Conventions\n- The alignment of Peru’s non-conviction based forfeiture model – Extinctón de dominio – with the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) Model Law\n- Its compatibility with the Recommendations of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), specifically Recommendation 4 on confiscation and provisional measures\n- The operational challenges of managing seized assets to preserve their value in light of FATF Recommendation 4\n- Non-conviction based asset forfeiture as a preventive mechanism, with lessons from Italian preventive confiscation\n- A comparative analysis of U.S. civil forfeiture and Peru’s Extinctón de dominio\n- Peru’s Extinctón de dominio and constitutional property rights, with insights from the regional Latin American experience\n\nGrounded in domestic practice and addressing the effects of recent legislative amendments, the publication offers judges, prosecutors, legislators and scholars a timely guide to applying, interpreting and strengthening asset forfeiture in line with international commitments.\n\nThis is the third issue in a series of publications on the use of Peru’s Extinctón de dominio legislation. It is a collaborative effort of asset recovery experts of the Basel Institute on Governance under the [Programa GFP Subnacional](https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gfpsubnacional.pe\u002F) (Subnational Public Finance Management programme in Peru), funded by the Swiss SECO Cooperation.\n\n**Authors**: Sergio Jiménez Niño, Jhanira Yamali Morales Aniceto, Walther Javier Delgado Tovar, Joseph Celso Domínguez Miñano, Sergio Enrique Rodríguez Salinas, Deily Arlene Pereda Rodríguez, Michel Martin Risco Solis.\n\n- Foreword by Sergio Jiménez Niño, Thematic Coordinator of the Asset Recovery Component, Programa GFP Subnacional\n- Preface by Oscar Solórzano, Head, Latin America ICAR\n","Programa GFP Subnacional – Basel Institute on Governance","2026-06-12",[16,19],{"url":17,"caption":18},"https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fla-extincion-del-dominio-de-bienes-instrumentalizados\u002F","Read the first issue of the series (in Spanish)",{"url":20,"caption":21},"https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fla-extincion-de-dominio-desde-sus-principios\u002F","Read the second issue of the series (in Spanish)",[23],{"url":24,"caption":25},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.gfpsubnacional.pe\u002Fpublicacion\u002Fla-extincion-de-dominio-en-el-marco-de-los-estandares-e-instrumentos-internacionales\u002F","Access this publication via Programa GFP website",false,[28],"Asset Recovery and Enforcement",[30],"Spanish",[32],"Report",[34],"Main page","Non-conviction based asset forfeiture has become a key tool for recovering illicit assets and supporting contemporary criminal policy against organised crime, corruption and transnational financial crime. Across seven chapters, this publication (in Spanish) connects international standards with Peruvian practice.",{"id":37,"storage":38,"filename_disk":39,"filename_download":40,"title":41,"type":42,"created_on":43,"modified_on":44,"charset":7,"filesize":45,"width":46,"height":47,"duration":7,"embed":7,"description":7,"location":7,"tags":7,"metadata":48,"focal_point_x":7,"focal_point_y":7,"tus_id":7,"tus_data":7,"uploaded_on":44},"0636208c-72f4-46c1-9ace-cc72e8f79ea8","local","0636208c-72f4-46c1-9ace-cc72e8f79ea8.jpg","Extincion-Dominio_instrumentos-internacionales_cover-image.jpg","Extincion Dominio Instrumentos Internacionales Cover Image","image\u002Fjpeg","2026-07-16T15:45:55.000Z","2026-07-16T15:45:56.000Z",191560,1654,2339,{},[50],{"id":51,"publications_id":52,"countries_id":71},1190,{"id":5,"status":6,"sort":7,"user_created":53,"date_created":8,"user_updated":53,"date_updated":9,"nid":7,"slug":10,"image":37,"title":11,"body":12,"citation":7,"language":7,"year":7,"publisher":13,"date_published":14,"external":7,"topic":7,"link_internal":54,"link_external":57,"featured":26,"topics":59,"languages":60,"type":61,"area":7,"programme":7,"websites":62,"summary":35,"pdf_text":7,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"countries":63,"tags":64,"pdf":68,"authors":70},"d22c72aa-896a-43ce-acca-4154ff70a25a",[55,56],{"url":17,"caption":18},{"url":20,"caption":21},[58],{"url":24,"caption":25},[28],[30],[32],[34],[51],[65,66,67],5242,5243,5244,[69],2557,[],{"id":72,"name":73,"code":74,"latitude":75,"longitude":76},171,"Peru","PE",-9.18997,-75.01515,[78,96,114],{"id":65,"publications_id":79,"tags_id":93},{"id":5,"status":6,"sort":7,"user_created":53,"date_created":8,"user_updated":53,"date_updated":9,"nid":7,"slug":10,"image":37,"title":11,"body":12,"citation":7,"language":7,"year":7,"publisher":13,"date_published":14,"external":7,"topic":7,"link_internal":80,"link_external":83,"featured":26,"topics":85,"languages":86,"type":87,"area":7,"programme":7,"websites":88,"summary":35,"pdf_text":7,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"countries":89,"tags":90,"pdf":91,"authors":92},[81,82],{"url":17,"caption":18},{"url":20,"caption":21},[84],{"url":24,"caption":25},[28],[30],[32],[34],[51],[65,66,67],[69],[],{"id":94,"name":95},1379,"Non-conviction based forfeiture",{"id":66,"publications_id":97,"tags_id":111},{"id":5,"status":6,"sort":7,"user_created":53,"date_created":8,"user_updated":53,"date_updated":9,"nid":7,"slug":10,"image":37,"title":11,"body":12,"citation":7,"language":7,"year":7,"publisher":13,"date_published":14,"external":7,"topic":7,"link_internal":98,"link_external":101,"featured":26,"topics":103,"languages":104,"type":105,"area":7,"programme":7,"websites":106,"summary":35,"pdf_text":7,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"countries":107,"tags":108,"pdf":109,"authors":110},[99,100],{"url":17,"caption":18},{"url":20,"caption":21},[102],{"url":24,"caption":25},[28],[30],[32],[34],[51],[65,66,67],[69],[],{"id":112,"name":113},858,"Asset management",{"id":67,"publications_id":115,"tags_id":129},{"id":5,"status":6,"sort":7,"user_created":53,"date_created":8,"user_updated":53,"date_updated":9,"nid":7,"slug":10,"image":37,"title":11,"body":12,"citation":7,"language":7,"year":7,"publisher":13,"date_published":14,"external":7,"topic":7,"link_internal":116,"link_external":119,"featured":26,"topics":121,"languages":122,"type":123,"area":7,"programme":7,"websites":124,"summary":35,"pdf_text":7,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"countries":125,"tags":126,"pdf":127,"authors":128},[117,118],{"url":17,"caption":18},{"url":20,"caption":21},[120],{"url":24,"caption":25},[28],[30],[32],[34],[51],[65,66,67],[69],[],{"id":130,"name":131},843,"Asset recovery",[133],{"id":69,"sort":134,"publications_id":135,"directus_files_id":149},1,{"id":5,"status":6,"sort":7,"user_created":53,"date_created":8,"user_updated":53,"date_updated":9,"nid":7,"slug":10,"image":37,"title":11,"body":12,"citation":7,"language":7,"year":7,"publisher":13,"date_published":14,"external":7,"topic":7,"link_internal":136,"link_external":139,"featured":26,"topics":141,"languages":142,"type":143,"area":7,"programme":7,"websites":144,"summary":35,"pdf_text":7,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"countries":145,"tags":146,"pdf":147,"authors":148},[137,138],{"url":17,"caption":18},{"url":20,"caption":21},[140],{"url":24,"caption":25},[28],[30],[32],[34],[51],[65,66,67],[69],[],{"id":150,"storage":38,"filename_disk":151,"filename_download":152,"title":153,"type":154,"folder":155,"uploaded_by":53,"created_on":156,"modified_by":7,"modified_on":157,"charset":7,"filesize":158,"width":7,"height":7,"duration":7,"embed":7,"description":7,"location":7,"tags":7,"metadata":7,"focal_point_x":7,"focal_point_y":7,"tus_id":7,"tus_data":7,"uploaded_on":157},"c5aea639-e1c8-4f33-bcd2-1cc8965c068c","c5aea639-e1c8-4f33-bcd2-1cc8965c068c.pdf","Publicacion_Extincion-Dominio_instrumentos_internacionales.pdf","Publicacion Extincion Dominio Instrumentos Internacionales","application\u002Fpdf","67f22e04-d26f-4baa-b91f-acc5f89d87f5","2026-07-16T15:58:28.000Z","2026-07-16T15:58:33.000Z",8156167,[],[161,221,292,331,372,408,462,499,552,592],{"id":162,"slug":163,"title":164,"status":6,"nid":165,"year":166,"body":167,"external":26,"topic":168,"language":170,"type":171,"date_published":173,"image":174,"citation":175,"publisher":176,"link_internal":177,"link_external":181,"authors":182,"countries":187,"tags":190,"pdf":211,"topics":213,"featured":214,"languages":215,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":217,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":219,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":220},2366,"wp-54","Working Paper 54: Targeting illicit wealth through non-conviction based forfeiture: Identifying human rights and other standards for Latin America",2701,2024,"This Working Paper explores the wide variety of non-conviction based (NCB) forfeiture laws in Latin America, with a special focus on the region’s predominant model, *Extinción de dominio*.\n\nIt argues that NCB forfeiture legislation, which allows for the recovery of stolen assets outside of criminal proceedings, can contribute significantly to a state’s criminal policy response to rampant economic and organised crime.\n\nThe paper emphasises the importance of critically reviewing and harmonising domestic practices of NCB forfeiture around emerging standards, so that they can reach their large potential in asset recovery. Ensuring their alignment with international human rights and other recognised norms and procedural rules ultimately builds trust, lends legitimacy and fosters judicial cooperation in international NCB forfeiture cases.\n\n### About this report\n\nThe paper is based on experience gained through the Basel Institute’s \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fasset-recovery\">International Centre for Asset Recovery\u003C\u002Fa> (ICAR), which since 2006 has supported partner countries in investigating, prosecuting and recovering assets arising from grand corruption and other crimes.\n\nThis paper is published as part of the Basel Institute on Governance Working Paper series, ISSN: 2624-9650. You may share or republish the Working Paper under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (\u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcreativecommons.org\u002Flicenses\u002Fby-nc-nd\u002F4.0\u002Fdeed.en\">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0\u003C\u002Fa>).\n\nSuggested citation: Solórzano, Oscar. 2024. ‘Targeting illicit wealth through non-conviction based forfeiture: Identifying human rights and other standards for Latin America.’ Working Paper 54, Basel Institute on Governance. Available at: baselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fwp-54.",[169],"Asset Recovery","English",[172],"Working Paper","2024-09-30","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002F37616510-2f1f-4ab6-9405-845433d6fa3b?width=600&height=840","","Basel Institute on Governance",[178],{"url":179,"caption":180},"\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications?type=Working%20Paper"," View all Working Papers",[],[183],{"authors_id":184},{"id":185,"name":186},294,"Oscar Solorzano",[188],{"countries_id":189},{"id":72,"name":73},[191,193,197,201,205,207],{"tags_id":192},{"id":130,"name":131},{"tags_id":194},{"id":195,"name":196},932,"Human rights",{"tags_id":198},{"id":199,"name":200},867,"Financial crime",{"tags_id":202},{"id":203,"name":204},967,"Organised crime",{"tags_id":206},{"id":94,"name":95},{"tags_id":208},{"id":209,"name":210},1215,"Illicit financial flows",[212],2404,[28],true,[170],"03bebfd8-0b40-4a2a-820d-b9d9c13b9de6","2024-10-03T16:05:11.000Z","3d9ff205-1640-4f34-b5b6-86977f51bbd6","2026-06-11T11:16:58.000Z","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fwp-54",{"id":222,"slug":223,"title":224,"status":6,"nid":225,"year":226,"body":227,"external":26,"topic":7,"language":7,"type":228,"date_published":230,"image":231,"citation":232,"publisher":176,"link_internal":233,"link_external":240,"authors":247,"countries":254,"tags":263,"pdf":280,"topics":282,"featured":26,"languages":283,"summary":284,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":285,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":218,"date_created":286,"user_updated":53,"date_updated":287,"main_points":288,"short_version":7,"subtitle":289,"og_image":290,"link":291},2441,"cs-13","Case Study 13: The Beauty Queen case: non-conviction based forfeiture across borders",2937,2026,"This Case Study analyses how Colombian authorities recovered assets linked to drug trafficking and held in a trust in Guernsey. It sets out the legal tools and procedures in Colombia and in Guernsey that enabled Colombia’s first international recovery under its non-conviction based forfeiture model _Extinción de dominio_. The Case Study highlights lessons for international cooperation between jurisdictions with different forfeiture systems or even legal traditions.\n\nThe International Centre for Asset Recovery (ICAR) at the Basel Institute on Governance provided technical assistance as part of a Memorandum of Understanding with the General Prosecutor’s Office of Colombia.\n\nOn 30 November 2023, the Fourth Court of the Specialised Extinción de Dominio Circuit of Colombia ordered the non-conviction based forfeiture of a Guernsey trust account issued by Northern Trust Fiduciary Services (Guernsey) Limited. The beneficiary was María Marcela Serrano Camacho, a Colombian model and former beauty queen.\n\nThe Colombian forfeiture order extinguished property rights over the account – amounting to GBP 361,146 – on the grounds that the funds were the proceeds of drug trafficking offences committed by Efraín Antonio Hernández Ramírez (“Don Efra”), a well-known Colombian drug trafficker, and his former spouse María Serrano in the 1990s.\n\nOn 30 January 2025, following successful mutual legal assistance proceedings between Colombia and the Bailiwick of Guernsey, the two jurisdictions concluded an asset sharing agreement for the repatriation of the confiscated assets.\n\nThis marked Colombia’s first successful international recovery through non-conviction based forfeiture.\n\nThis Case Study examines how early and effective coordination between Colombia and Guernsey enabled the identification, freezing, forfeiture and repatriation of the assets. It analyses the legal framework underpinning Colombia's Extinción de dominio regime and how it was applied, leading to the forfeiture of the Guernsey acccount. It also describes the procedural mechanisms used in Guernsey to execute foreign non-conviction based forfeiture orders.\n\nThe interaction between the authorities in both jurisdictions offers valuable lessons and examples of good practices.\n\nThe Case Study can be read alongside [Policy Brief 16](https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fpb-16): \"Enforcing foreign non-conviction based forfeiture orders: FATF standards and asset recovery practice in Latin America and financial centres\".\n\n### About this Case Study\n\nThis publication is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Case Study series, [ISSN 2813-3900](https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcase-studies). It is licensed for sharing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License ([CC BYNC-ND 4.0](https:\u002F\u002Fcreativecommons.org\u002Flicenses\u002Fby-nc-nd\u002F4.0\u002F)).\n\nThe Case Study series offers practitioners insights into interesting and precedent-setting cases involving corruption and asset recovery.\n\nThis is a publication of the International Centre for Asset Recovery (ICAR) at the Basel Institute on Governance. ICAR receives core funding from the Governments of Jersey, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and the UK.\n\n**Disclaimer**: This Case Study is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute and\u002For substitute legal or other professional advice. The contents are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the Basel Institute on Governance, its donors and partners, or the University of Basel.\n",[229],"Case Study","2026-03-31","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002F6f1661b8-eab6-4ce0-902d-f6c97f85dd29?width=600&height=840","Solórzano, Oscar, and Diana Cordero. 2026. ‘The Beauty Queen case: non-conviction based forfeiture of criminal assets across borders. Lessons learned from Colombia–Guernsey cooperation.’ Case Study 13, Basel Institute on Governance. Available at: [baselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fcs-13](https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fcs-13).",[234,237],{"url":235,"caption":236},"\u002Fresources\u002Fnews\u002Fcolombiaguernsey-cooperation-leads-to-successful-non-conviction-based-forfeiture-of-illicit-assets-2716","Read related blog",{"url":238,"caption":239},"\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fpb-16","Read related Policy Brief 16",[241,244],{"url":242,"caption":243},"https:\u002F\u002Flearn.baselgovernance.org\u002Fcourse\u002Fview.php?id=368","View online on Basel LEARN",{"url":245,"caption":246},"https:\u002F\u002Flearn.baselgovernance.org\u002Fcourse\u002Fview.php?id=72","eLearning course: International Cooperation and Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters",[248,250],{"authors_id":249},{"id":185,"name":186},{"authors_id":251},{"id":252,"name":253},591,"Diana Cordero",[255,259],{"countries_id":256},{"id":257,"name":258},47,"Colombia",{"countries_id":260},{"id":261,"name":262},78,"Guernsey",[264,266,270,274,278],{"tags_id":265},{"id":94,"name":95},{"tags_id":267},{"id":268,"name":269},822,"International cooperation",{"tags_id":271},{"id":272,"name":273},818,"Anti-money laundering",{"tags_id":275},{"id":276,"name":277},1374,"Law enforcement",{"tags_id":279},{"id":130,"name":131},[281],2495,[28],[170],"This Case Study analyses how Colombian authorities recovered assets linked to drug trafficking and held in a trust in Guernsey. It sets out the legal tools and procedures in Colombia and in Guernsey that enabled Colombia’s first international recovery under its non-conviction based forfeiture model Extinción de dominio.",[34],"2026-06-01T22:10:26.000Z","2026-06-17T07:15:54.000Z","- Early and trust-based international cooperation is decisive\n- Non-conviction based forfeiture is indispensable when criminal routes are closed\n- Identifying beneficial ownership is central to effective asset recovery\n- Direct enforcement of foreign forfeiture orders increases efficiency and legal certainty\n- Asset sharing agreements strengthen cooperation incentives","Lessons learned from Colombia–Guernsey cooperation","4827eac2-84e4-4fca-a5f5-20c61c46d4ab","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fcs-13",{"id":293,"slug":294,"title":295,"status":6,"nid":296,"year":297,"body":298,"external":26,"topic":299,"language":170,"type":300,"date_published":302,"image":303,"citation":175,"publisher":176,"link_internal":304,"link_external":308,"authors":312,"countries":317,"tags":318,"pdf":323,"topics":326,"featured":26,"languages":327,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":328,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":329,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":330},2415,"qg41","Quick Guide 41: Managing seized and confiscated assets",2834,2025,"This Quick Guide explains why effective, transparent and fair management of seized and confiscated assets – including assets linked to sanctions violations – is essential to successful asset recovery. It introduces key principles, standards and practical steps based on international good practice. These include legal, institutional and technical arrangements, that help countries manage seized assets in a way that preserves value, ensures accountability and supports justice.\n\nThe Guide is primarily intended for government officials working in law enforcement, justice and asset recovery. It may also be useful to policymakers and development partners seeking a better understanding of how countries can improve their asset management systems.\n\n### About this Quick Guide\n\nYou are free to share and republish this work under a \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcreativecommons.org\u002Flicenses\u002Fby-nc-nd\u002F4.0\u002F\">Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0 Licence\u003C\u002Fa>. It is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Quick Guide series, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.baselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications?type=2428\">ISSN 2673-5229\u003C\u002Fa>.",[169],[301],"Quick Guide","2025-07-16","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002F8b319ca1-ed7c-4d10-874e-a1583fed7ffc?width=600&height=840",[305],{"url":306,"caption":307},"\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications?type=Quick%20Guide"," View all Quick Guides",[309],{"url":310,"caption":311},"https:\u002F\u002Flearn.baselgovernance.org\u002Fcourse\u002Fview.php?id=337","View online on LEARN",[313],{"authors_id":314},{"id":315,"name":316},553,"Rita Simões",[],[319,321],{"tags_id":320},{"id":112,"name":113},{"tags_id":322},{"id":130,"name":131},[324,325],2469,2470,[28],[170],"2025-08-21T23:52:11.000Z","2026-06-11T11:21:50.000Z","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fqg41",{"id":332,"slug":333,"title":334,"status":6,"nid":335,"year":166,"body":336,"external":26,"topic":337,"language":170,"type":338,"date_published":339,"image":340,"citation":175,"publisher":341,"link_internal":342,"link_external":351,"authors":354,"countries":359,"tags":360,"pdf":365,"topics":367,"featured":26,"languages":368,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":369,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":370,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":371},2347,"quick-guide-30-asset-recovery-legislation-best-practices","Quick Guide 30: Asset recovery legislation",2622,"Asset recovery tools are integral to combatting corruption, organised crime, sanctions evasion and other profit-motivated crimes. However, in many states, the range of asset recovery tools available to law enforcement and criminal justice agencies is limited. \n\nThis quick guide examines the established good practices in asset recovery legislation as well as less conventional, broader measures. It shows how states can widen their asset recovery toolkit and increase the potential for asset recovery success. \n\nIt is drawn from a comparative study of good practices in asset recovery legislation in selected Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) participating States, published as Working Paper 51 in March 2024 by the Basel Institute on Governance and OSCE. \n\n### About this Quick Guide\n\nThis work is licensed under a \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fcreativecommons.org\u002Flicenses\u002Fby-nc-nd\u002F4.0\u002F\">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License\u003C\u002Fa>. It is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Quick Guide series, \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.baselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications?type=2428\">ISSN 2673-5229\u003C\u002Fa>.",[169],[301],"2024-05-07","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002Fafbbcd0b-c295-4832-83bf-742d000ed004?width=600&height=840","Basel Institute on Governance ",[343,346,349],{"url":344,"caption":345},"\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fwp-51"," View full Working Paper 51",{"url":347,"caption":348},"\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fquick-guide-31-disposal-and-sharing-confiscated-assets-best-practices","View related Quick Guide 31: The disposal and sharing of confiscated assets",{"url":306,"caption":350},"View all Quick Guides",[352],{"url":353,"caption":311},"https:\u002F\u002Flearn.baselgovernance.org\u002Fcourse\u002Fview.php?id=242",[355],{"authors_id":356},{"id":357,"name":358},306,"Andrew Dornbierer",[],[361,363],{"tags_id":362},{"id":130,"name":131},{"tags_id":364},{"id":94,"name":95},[366],2386,[28],[170],"2024-05-07T10:05:12.000Z","2026-06-11T11:09:16.000Z","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fquick-guide-30-asset-recovery-legislation-best-practices",{"id":373,"slug":374,"title":375,"status":6,"nid":376,"year":166,"body":377,"external":26,"topic":378,"language":170,"type":379,"date_published":380,"image":381,"citation":382,"publisher":383,"link_internal":384,"link_external":386,"authors":387,"countries":390,"tags":391,"pdf":402,"topics":404,"featured":26,"languages":405,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":406,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":407,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":344},2340,"wp-51","Working Paper 51: Good practices in asset recovery legislation in selected OSCE participating States",2607,"Asset recovery tools are integral to combating corruption, organised crime, sanctions evasion and other profit-motivated crimes. However, in many participating States of the OSCE, the range of asset recovery tools available to law enforcement and criminal justice agencies is limited.\n\nThis Working Paper identifies legislative mechanisms in OSCE participating States that empower the state to confiscate suspected or proven proceeds of crime. The overall objective is to ascertain: \n\n\n- Established good practices with regard to the design of these legislative mechanisms.\n- Any unique approaches that particular countries have taken in this context that could be replicated and tested in other jurisdictions.\n\n\nIt covers:\n\n\n- Conviction-based asset recovery mechanisms.\n- Non-conviction based mechanisms including civil recovery.\n- Additional mechanisms such as illicit enrichment laws and other laws that reverse the burden of proof regarding the legitimacy of assets.\n- Considerations regarding the adoption of broader asset recovery laws.\n- Approaches to the disposal of confiscated assets.\n- Common challenges in the implementation of asset recovery mechanisms.\n\n\n### About this report\n\nThis comparative study was conducted and drafted by the International Centre for Asset Recovery at the Basel Institute on Governance for the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). The paper was commissioned under the extra-budgetary project ‘Strengthening asset recovery efforts in the OSCE region’ implemented by the OSCE Secretariat’s Transnational Threats Department and the Office of the Co-ordinator of OSCE Economic and Environmental Activities.\n\nIt is published as part of the Basel Institute on Governance Working Paper series, ISSN: 2624-9650. You may share or republish it under a Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licence.\n\n### Disclaimer\n\nThis Working Paper is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute and\u002For substitute legal or other professional advice. The contents are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views and the official position of the Basel Institute on Governance, the OSCE and its participating States.",[169],[172],"2024-03-25","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002F874c9d29-7337-4e37-8b50-36a26d00bf28?width=600&height=840","Dornbierer, Andrew. 2024. ‘Good practices in asset recovery legislation in selected OSCE participating States.’ Working Paper 51, Basel Institute on Governance and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE). Available at: baselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fwp-51","Basel Institute on Governance; Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)",[385],{"url":179,"caption":180},[],[388],{"authors_id":389},{"id":357,"name":358},[],[392,396,398,400],{"tags_id":393},{"id":394,"name":395},821,"Unexplained wealth",{"tags_id":397},{"id":94,"name":95},{"tags_id":399},{"id":130,"name":131},{"tags_id":401},{"id":209,"name":210},[403],2508,[28],[170],"2024-03-25T11:04:47.000Z","2026-06-11T11:07:24.000Z",{"id":409,"slug":410,"title":411,"status":6,"nid":412,"year":413,"body":414,"external":26,"topic":415,"language":170,"type":416,"date_published":417,"image":418,"citation":175,"publisher":419,"link_internal":420,"link_external":425,"authors":426,"countries":429,"tags":442,"pdf":455,"topics":457,"featured":26,"languages":458,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":459,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":460,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":461},2266,"wp-42","Working Paper 42: From sanctions to confiscation while upholding the rule of law",2338,2023,"This paper will be released on 21 February 2023.\n\nWritten in the light of Russia's war of aggression in Ukraine, the Working Paper explores whether it is justifiable to confiscate assets frozen under financial sanctions in order to redirect them to the victims of state aggression. \n\nThe paper first explores the concept of sanctions and financial sanctions (asset freezes) and what they mean in practice.\n\nUsing the example of Canada, which has introduced a legislative mechanism for this purpose, the paper analyses whether states should be able to confiscate sanctioned assets purely on the basis that they have been sanctioned.\n\nIt then looks at more established measures that states could adopt and apply to target sanctioned assets, including:\n\n\n- Traditional conviction based confiscation measures, including 'extended confiscation' mechanisms\n- Non-conviction based confiscation (forfeiture) measures\n- Unexplained wealth laws\n\n\nThe paper recommends ways to maximise the effectiveness of these alternative avenues for recovering assets, which are much less controversial and can arguably be applied without infringing on legal rights. \n\nOpting for mechanisms that abide by established legal rights will not only significantly increase the chance of recovering assets without subsequent legal challenges. It will also ensure that the very reason for targeting the assets in the first place – namely to seek justice and compensation for acts of aggression – is not undermined through the erosion of the rule of law. \n\n### About this Paper\n\nThis Working Paper was prepared by the Basel Institute on Governance.\n\nIt is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Working Paper Series, ISSN: 2624-9650. You may share or republish the Working Paper under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (\u003Ca href=\"mailto:https:\u002F\u002Fcreativecommons.org\u002Flicenses\u002Fby-nc-nd\u002F4.0\u002F\">CC BY-NC-ND 4.0\u003C\u002Fa>).\n\nSuggested citation: Dornbierer, Andrew. 2023. ‘Confiscating assets frozen under sanctions without undermining the rule of law.’ Working Paper 42, Basel Institute on Governance. Available at: \u003Ca href=\"mailto:https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fwp-42\">baselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fwp-42\u003C\u002Fa>.\n\n### Acknowledgements\n\nThe Basel Institute would like to thank Isys Lam and the law firms of \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fbonifassi-avocats.com\u002Fen\u002F\">Bonifassi Avocats\u003C\u002Fa> (France), \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.hengeler.com\u002Fen\">Hengeler Mueller\u003C\u002Fa> (Germany), \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.bennettjones.com\u002F\">Bennett Jones\u003C\u002Fa> (Canada) and \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.raassociados.pt\u002F\">Rogério Alves & Associados\u003C\u002Fa> (Portugal) for their support in providing research for this paper.\n\nThe Basel Institute would also like to thank Stefan Lenz, Stefan Cassella, Maria Nizzero, Nicola Bonucci and Oscar Solórzano for their support in reviewing the content of the paper and recommending amendments.",[169],[172],"2023-02-20","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002Faaa4fae3-eea5-4be3-95b1-4de7e87fabb4?width=600&height=840","Basel Institute on Governance, Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE)",[421,423],{"url":422,"caption":236},"\u002Fresources\u002Fnews\u002Fworking-paper-sheds-fresh-light-on-the-sanctions-and-confiscation-debate-2347",{"url":179,"caption":424},"View all Working Papers",[],[427],{"authors_id":428},{"id":357,"name":358},[430,434,438],{"countries_id":431},{"id":432,"name":433},36,"Canada",{"countries_id":435},{"id":436,"name":437},188,"Russia",{"countries_id":439},{"id":440,"name":441},225,"Ukraine",[443,447,449,451,453],{"tags_id":444},{"id":445,"name":446},1227,"Sanctions",{"tags_id":448},{"id":394,"name":395},{"tags_id":450},{"id":130,"name":131},{"tags_id":452},{"id":94,"name":95},{"tags_id":454},{"id":209,"name":210},[456],2544,[28],[170],"2023-02-20T17:04:17.000Z","2026-06-11T11:25:32.000Z","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fwp-42",{"id":463,"slug":464,"title":465,"status":6,"nid":466,"year":166,"body":467,"external":26,"topic":468,"language":170,"type":469,"date_published":470,"image":471,"citation":175,"publisher":176,"link_internal":472,"link_external":473,"authors":474,"countries":483,"tags":488,"pdf":491,"topics":494,"featured":26,"languages":495,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":496,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":497,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":498},2379,"gender-and-asset-recovery-developing-gender-sensitive-framework-asset-recovery","Gender and asset recovery: Developing a gender-sensitive framework for asset recovery technical assistance programmes. A case study of Mozambique",2728,"This summary report examines gender-related aspects within the International Centre for Asset Recovery (ICAR) programme in Mozambique as relevant for programme management and delivery. The research also explored potential gender considerations within anti-corruption and asset recovery laws and policies.\n\nThe findings and recommendations developing a gender-sensitive framework for technical assistance programmes are relevant beyond the Mozambique case study.\n\n### About this report\n\nThis is an abridged version of an original research report funded by the Embassy of Switzerland in Mozambique. The contents of the research report and this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and the official position of the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs, Basel Institute on Governance, U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre or other stakeholders.\n\nCopyright: Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs.",[169],[32],"2024-03-29","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002F2825ad52-99fd-4ae3-bcc0-63171e588f39?width=600&height=840",[],[],[475,479],{"authors_id":476},{"id":477,"name":478},551,"Monica Kirya",{"authors_id":480},{"id":481,"name":482},552,"Carmeliza Rosario",[484],{"countries_id":485},{"id":486,"name":487},156,"Mozambique",[489],{"tags_id":490},{"id":130,"name":131},[492,493],2418,2417,[28],[170],"2024-12-05T14:06:51.000Z","2026-05-29T22:22:53.000Z","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fgender-and-asset-recovery-developing-gender-sensitive-framework-asset-recovery",{"id":500,"slug":501,"title":502,"status":6,"nid":503,"year":504,"body":505,"external":26,"topic":506,"language":507,"type":508,"date_published":509,"image":510,"citation":175,"publisher":176,"link_internal":511,"link_external":518,"authors":522,"countries":523,"tags":542,"pdf":545,"topics":547,"featured":26,"languages":548,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":549,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":550,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":551},2214,"lisbon-conference","Perda sem condenação na recuperação de ativos: Recomendações da Conferência de Lisboa – 5, 6 e 7 de Julho 2022",2262,2022,"Este breve relatório resume as principais recomendações da \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fnews\u002Fconferencia-de-lisboa-2022-paises-lusofonos-reunem-se-para-alargar-os-mecanismos-para\">Conferência de Lisboa\u003C\u002Fa> sobre o potencial do confisco civil para recuperar bens ilícitos, que teve lugar em Lisboa, Portugal, em 5-7 de Julho de 2022. A conferência reuniu representantes de alto nível de Angola, Cabo Verde, Moçambique e Timor-Leste, juntamente com peritos internacionais.\n\nAs recomendações incluem:\n\n\n- Harmonização da legislação e sua correta aplicação\n- Abordagem integrada e coordenação entre as várias instituições\n- Rapidez e autonomia\n- Cooperação judiciária internacional\n- Abordagem multidisciplinar - criação de novos mecanismos\n- Investimento na formação\n\n\nA conferência teve lugar no contexto do programa de \u003Ca href=\"https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fsites\u002Fdefault\u002Ffiles\u002F2022-02\u002F220208_icar-inl-info-sheet-pt.pdf\">Apoio à adopção de legislação de confisco civil como ferramenta para a recuperação de activos\u003C\u002Fa>. O programa e uma iniciativa do *International Centre for Asset Recovery (ICAR)* do *Basel Institute on Governance*, financiado pelo *Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs* do Departamento de Estado dos EUA, que explora o potencial de inovação na recuperação de bens através de mecanismos de perda\u002Fconfisco sem condenação.",[169],"Portuguese",[32],"2022-08-02","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002Fe845d643-a8a3-4f7e-a189-7328be0aa992?width=600&height=840",[512,515],{"url":513,"caption":514},"\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Flisbon-conference-en"," View English translation",{"url":516,"caption":517},"\u002Fresources\u002Fnews\u002Fconferencia-de-lisboa-2022-paises-lusofonos-reunem-se-para-alargar-os-mecanismos-para-a-recuperacao-de-activos-2252"," Ver comunicado de imprensa",[519],{"url":520,"caption":521},"https:\u002F\u002Fwww.youtube.com\u002Fwatch?v=p0G2aW44dCc&list=PLYRnhpCcnLP9ioDagVBHWCqL31dYqjPjM"," Ver a lista de reprodução da conferência no YouTube",[],[524,528,530,534,538],{"countries_id":525},{"id":526,"name":527},9,"Angola",{"countries_id":529},{"id":486,"name":487},{"countries_id":531},{"id":532,"name":533},216,"Timor-Leste",{"countries_id":535},{"id":536,"name":537},181,"Portugal",{"countries_id":539},{"id":540,"name":541},50,"Cape Verde",[543],{"tags_id":544},{"id":94,"name":95},[546],2253,[28],[507],"2022-08-14T19:40:41.000Z","2026-06-08T16:45:19.000Z","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Flisbon-conference",{"id":553,"slug":554,"title":555,"status":6,"nid":556,"year":413,"body":557,"external":26,"topic":558,"language":170,"type":559,"date_published":561,"image":562,"citation":175,"publisher":563,"link_internal":564,"link_external":565,"authors":569,"countries":576,"tags":583,"pdf":586,"topics":587,"featured":26,"languages":588,"summary":7,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":216,"date_created":589,"user_updated":218,"date_updated":590,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":7,"og_image":7,"link":591},2306,"swiss-peruvian-asset-recovery-case-boosts-prospects-non-conviction-based-forfeiture","A Swiss–Peruvian asset recovery case boosts prospects for non-conviction based forfeiture (The Academy Bulletin)",2493,"In an article published in the inaugural issue of the Bulletin of The International Academy of Financial Crime Litigators, Oscar Solorzano and Gretta Fenner analyse a recent decision of the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, which cleared the way for returning funds tied to corruption to Peru. The decision sets an important precedent for the use of non-conviction based forfeiture laws to recover illicit assets in the absence of a criminal conviction. This is a crucial step in the fight against global corruption. \n\nThe Bulletin is a new publication from The International Academy of Financial Crime Litigators. It has been established to transmit the work of Academy Fellows, draw attention to matters of importance to the legal community and provide high-level analysis of cutting-edge issues in global financial crime investigations and litigation. The Basel Institute on Governance acts as Secretariat to the Academy.",[169],[560],"Article","2023-06-01","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002F17760cb2-f1dd-45f5-9816-325062913bd7?width=600&height=840","International Academy of Financial Crime Litigators",[],[566],{"url":567,"caption":568},"https:\u002F\u002Fedit.financialcrimelitigators.org\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002F70756bf9-c043-49a2-a6fa-c78057ddd52c.pdf","Summer Bulletin of the International Academy of Financial Crime Litigators",[570,574],{"authors_id":571},{"id":572,"name":573},297,"Gretta Fenner",{"authors_id":575},{"id":185,"name":186},[577,581],{"countries_id":578},{"id":579,"name":580},41,"Switzerland",{"countries_id":582},{"id":72,"name":73},[584],{"tags_id":585},{"id":94,"name":95},[],[28],[170],"2023-08-02T10:04:35.000Z","2026-06-11T10:58:50.000Z","\u002Fresources\u002Fpublications\u002Fswiss-peruvian-asset-recovery-case-boosts-prospects-non-conviction-based-forfeiture",{"id":593,"slug":594,"title":595,"status":6,"nid":596,"year":226,"body":597,"external":26,"topic":7,"language":7,"type":598,"date_published":230,"image":600,"citation":601,"publisher":176,"link_internal":602,"link_external":605,"authors":607,"countries":610,"tags":611,"pdf":620,"topics":622,"featured":26,"languages":623,"summary":624,"programme":7,"area":7,"websites":7,"pdf_text":7,"sort":7,"user_created":218,"date_created":286,"user_updated":53,"date_updated":625,"main_points":7,"short_version":7,"subtitle":626,"og_image":7,"link":238},2442,"pb-16","Policy Brief 16: Enforcing foreign non-conviction based forfeiture orders",2947,"This Policy Brief analyses emerging international standards aimed at addressing recurring challenges in judicial practice with regard to the enforcement of non-conviction based forfeiture orders issued by foreign states. It focuses in particular on the historical absence of a binding obligation on requested states to cooperate in such cases and, where cooperation is available, on the structural tension between direct and indirect enforcement models.\n\nRevisions in 2023 to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations 4 and 38 seek to clarify and strengthen states’ cooperation in the enforcement of foreign forfeiture orders. In this context, the recognition and execution of foreign non-conviction based forfeiture orders are central components of the evolving international asset recovery framework.\n\nThrough analysis and case studies involving Latin American states and international financial centres, this Policy Brief demonstrates that the choice of procedural model for enforcing foreign forfeiture orders – direct or indirect – has significant implications, while acknowledging the competing legal and institutional interests involved.\n\nIn line with FATF Recommendation 38, the Policy Brief argues in favour of direct enforcement in the requested state, based on the facts established by the foreign authority. This promotes efficiency, legal certainty and mutual trust. Indirect enforcement models that may require domestic investigations by the requested state, on the other hand, often lead to delays, duplication and increased costs, which hinders international asset recovery efforts.\n\nThe analysis provides empirical insight into how the revised FATF standards address practical deficiencies and the implications for judicial practice in requested states. For the Latin American context, the Policy Brief suggests to go beyond technical compliance of domestic non-conviction based forfeiture regimes with the FATF standards to strengthen the effectiveness of cross-border enforcement in practice.\n\nThis Policy Brief can be read alongside [Case Study 13](http:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fcs-13): “The Beauty Queen case: non-conviction based forfeiture across borders. Lessons learned from Colombia–Guernsey cooperation.”\n\n### About this Policy Brief\n\nThis publication is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Policy Brief series [ISSN 2624-9669](https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications?type\\[]=257). You may freely share or republish it under a Creative Commons [BY-NC-ND 4.0](https:\u002F\u002Fcreativecommons.org\u002Flicenses\u002Fby-nc-nd\u002F4.0\u002F) licence.\n\nIt is a publication of the International Centre for Asset Recovery (ICAR) at the Basel Institute on Governance. ICAR receives core funding from the Governments of Jersey, Liechtenstein, Norway, Switzerland and the UK.\n\n**Disclaimer**: This Policy Brief is intended for general informational purposes and does not constitute and\u002For substitute legal or other professional advice. The contents are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Basel Institute on Governance, its donors and partners, or the University of Basel.\n",[599],"Policy Brief","https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcms\u002Fapi\u002Fassets\u002Ff866220c-dddd-41b3-a45e-c2d7992d39e1?width=600&height=840","Solórzano, Oscar. 2026. 'Enforcing foreign non-conviction based forfeiture orders: FATF standards and asset recovery practice in Latin America and financial centres.' Policy Brief 16, Basel Institute on Governance. Available at: [baselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fpb-16](https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fpublications\u002Fpb-16).",[603],{"url":291,"caption":604},"Read related Case Study 13",[606],{"url":245,"caption":246},[608],{"authors_id":609},{"id":185,"name":186},[],[612,614,616,618],{"tags_id":613},{"id":94,"name":95},{"tags_id":615},{"id":268,"name":269},{"tags_id":617},{"id":272,"name":273},{"tags_id":619},{"id":276,"name":277},[621],2496,[28],[170],"This Policy Brief analyses emerging international standards aimed at addressing recurring challenges in judicial practice with regard to the enforcement of non-conviction based forfeiture orders issued by foreign states. It focuses in particular on the historical absence of a binding obligation on requested states to cooperate in such cases and on the structural tension between direct and indirect enforcement models.","2026-06-17T07:08:33.000Z","FATF standards and asset recovery practice in Latin America and financial centres",1784222022869]