[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":110},["ShallowReactive",2],{"author-523":3,"author-team-523":6,"author-work-523":7},{"id":4,"name":5,"image":6},523,"Lakso Anindito",null,{"publications":8,"news":109},[9,50,75,91],{"id":10,"title":11,"slug":12,"image":13,"type":14,"date_published":16,"publisher":17,"summary":6,"body":18,"area":6,"programme":6,"languages":19,"countries":21,"tags":25},2433,"Addressing conflicts of interest and corruption in Indonesia’s energy transition","addressing-conflicts-interest-and-corruption-indonesias-energy-transition","d97f2ca5-300d-45c9-9de9-33152b72f96c",[15],"Report","2026-02-24","U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre","This U4 Issue analyses Indonesia's ambitious energy transition and highlights how political finance, weak regulations and a \"revolving door\" of personnel between public office and the private sector create vulnerabilities. The publication was produced by U4 and the Basel Institute on Governance through its Green Corruption programme.\n\n### About the paper\n\nConflicts of interest and corruption in Indonesia's political economy pose significant risks to its energy transition, including the Just Energy Transition Partnership. Existing legal and institutional frameworks are fragmented, inconsistently applied, and often fail to address the risk of state capture by powerful political and economic actors, especially in the extractive and energy sectors.\n\nThe reliance on fossil fuel industries for political financing and the monopolistic nature of state-owned entities further complicate the shift to a low- or no-carbon system, despite the country's ambitious renewable energy targets.\n\nPotential pathways to greater anti-corruption resilience lie in improvements to beneficial ownership transparency and strengthening regulation, monitoring and sanctioning of conflict of interest violations.\n",[20],"English",[22],{"countries_id":23},{"name":24},"Indonesia",[26,30,34,38,42,46],{"tags_id":27},{"id":28,"name":29},982,"Anti-corruption",{"tags_id":31},{"id":32,"name":33},818,"Anti-money laundering",{"tags_id":35},{"id":36,"name":37},804,"Natural resources",{"tags_id":39},{"id":40,"name":41},1371,"Public governance",{"tags_id":43},{"id":44,"name":45},1236,"Compliance",{"tags_id":47},{"id":48,"name":49},973,"Corruption",{"id":51,"title":52,"slug":53,"image":54,"type":55,"date_published":57,"publisher":58,"summary":6,"body":59,"area":6,"programme":6,"languages":60,"countries":61,"tags":64},2428,"Case Study 12: Indonesia: a landmark money laundering conviction in a forestry crime case","cs-12","cb6cbdfc-7348-43d5-bfc0-2d3fc41157cd",[56],"Case Study","2025-11-25","Basel Institute on Governance","This Case Study highlights how investigators of Indonesia’s Ministry of Environment and Forestry achieved their first conviction for money laundering linked to forestry offences, leveraging institutional and legal changes in financial investigation procedures.\n\n### About this Case Study\n\nThis publication is part of the Basel Institute on Governance Case Study series, [ISSN 2813-3900](https:\u002F\u002Fbaselgovernance.org\u002Fcase-studies). It is licensed for sharing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License [CC BY-NC-ND 4.0](https:\u002F\u002Fcreativecommons.org\u002Flicenses\u002Fby-nc-nd\u002F4.0\u002F).\n\nThe development of this publication was funded through the Illegal Wildlife Trade (IWT) Challenge Fund.\n\nThe contents are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Basel Institute on Governance, its donors and partners, or the University of Basel.",[20],[62],{"countries_id":63},{"name":24},[65,67,71],{"tags_id":66},{"id":32,"name":33},{"tags_id":68},{"id":69,"name":70},1303,"Environment",{"tags_id":72},{"id":73,"name":74},1193,"Financial investigations",{"id":76,"title":77,"slug":78,"image":79,"type":80,"date_published":82,"publisher":83,"summary":6,"body":84,"area":6,"programme":6,"languages":85,"countries":87,"tags":90},2315,"Conflict of interest guidelines for Indonesian public institutions (Pedoman tentang Konflik Kepentingan)","conflict-interest-guidelines-indonesian-public-institutions-pedoman-tentang-konflik","d6b892ff-09d4-4c28-91d6-6c94440b48d8",[81],"Guidelines","2023-11-03","","Through the USAID INTEGRITAS programme, KEMITRAAN and its consortium partners – Indonesia Corruption Watch, Transparency International – Indonesia and the Basel Institute on Governance – are working to enhance conflict of interest policy in Indonesia and its implementation.\n\nThis guidance has been developed in this context, in order to assist Indonesian government institutions in strengthening controls against conflicts of interest.\n\nIt aims to help these institutions to close gaps between existing conflict of interest regulations in Indonesia and international good practices in areas such as regulations, codes of conduct and sanctions.\n\nThe document combines sample text with targeted guidance on identifying, avoiding, disclosing, mitigating and sanctioning different forms of conflict of interest. These include external engagements, \"revolving doors\", insider trading, family\u002Fpersonal relationships and gifts\u002Fentertainment.\n\nBy using this guidance to improve their systems and processes for managing conflicts of interest, Indonesian institutions can better prevent corrupt practices such as collusion and nepotism from undermining their operations and integrity.\n\nThe guidance is tailored to Indonesia’s specific legal framework, institutional context and historical efforts to prevent and combat corruption.\n\n### Acknowledgements and disclaimer\n\nThe development of these guidelines was led by the Basel Institute on Governance, in cooperation with KEMITRAAN, Indonesia Corruption Watch and Transparency International Indonesia. The original version was produced in English by the Basel Institute, and was subsequently translated into Bahasa Indonesia by KEMITRAAN.\n\nThese guidelines were made possible by the support of the American people through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). The contents are the sole responsibility of the Basel Institute on Governance and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States Government.\n\nWe would like to give credit to Pauline Arifin and Khaerudin for their contributions to the initial development of these guidelines.",[86],"Bahasa Indonesia",[88],{"countries_id":89},{"name":24},[],{"id":92,"title":93,"slug":94,"image":95,"type":96,"date_published":97,"publisher":98,"summary":6,"body":99,"area":6,"programme":6,"languages":100,"countries":101,"tags":104},2284,"Corruption and Infrastructure: Preliminary Study on Corruption Risks in Infrastructure Sector","corruption-and-infrastructure-preliminary-study-corruption-risks-infrastructure-sector","1a822309-e14a-4cdf-9e4e-a8b01ab2c950",[56],"2023-06-07","Alliance for Integrity","This preliminary study on corruption risks in infrastructure sector provides an overview of the current legal framework and corruption risks in the infrastructure sector in Indonesia, and offers recommendations for addressing these risks, with a focus on Collective Action as a potential solution.\n\nIndeed, in Indonesia, where infrastructure development has been prioritised, there is a pressing need to address corruption risks to ensure that infrastructure projects contribute to the country's sustainable economic and social development. The Alliance for Integrity recognises the critical importance of tackling corruption in this sector and works to promote Collective Action approaches that bring together stakeholders to combat corruption.",[20],[102],{"countries_id":103},{"name":24},[105],{"tags_id":106},{"id":107,"name":108},909,"Collective Action",[],1786951362922]